Transitional fossils as proof of evolution

It is simply not true. Actually, it is just a fairy tale for adults based on ancient pagan religious philosophy that hundreds of millions of people around the world choose to believe with blind faith.

Transitional fossils as proof of evolution

This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by expanding it with reliably sourced entries. Possibly the best known of all transitional fossils, the Berlin specimen of Archaeopteryx lithographica This is a tentative partial list of transitional fossils fossil remains of groups that exhibits both "primitive" and derived traits.

The fossils are listed in series, showing the transition from one group to another, representing significant steps in the evolution of major features in various lineages.

Almost all of the transitional forms in this list do not actually represent ancestors of any living group or other transitional forms. Darwin noted that transitional forms could be considered common ancestorsdirect ancestors or collateral ancestors of living or extinct groups, but believed that finding actual common or direct ancestors linking different groups was unlikely.

Transitional fossils as proof of evolution

This kind of thinking can be extended to groups of life. For instance, the well-known Archaeopteryx is a transitional form between non-avian dinosaurs and birds, but it is not the most recent common ancestor of all birds nor is it a direct ancestor of any species of bird alive today.

An abstract of the presentations to follow Primary source references As a preface to this document, I want to point out that it is a shame that we have to continue to refute the same arguments that evolutionists keep bringing up over and over again in their attempts to argue against the fact of creation, which fact has been well established since the day the earth was created ex nihilo several thousand years ago.

Rather, it is considered an extinct close evolutionary "cousin" to the direct ancestors. This may not always be the case, though, as some fossil species are proposed to be directly ancestral to others, like how Australopithecus anamensis is most likely to be ancestral to Australopithecus afarensis.These fallacious arguments for evolution are the main bulk of what I encounter on the 'net.

The remaining part is the evolutionist providing just a link to a pro-evolution website in order to distract me by having me waste a day or two of my time with the contents of that link while the evolutionist "runs" away. Ever notice how evolutionists will manipulate reality to try and do away with creationism?

For example, when you ask an evolutionist how they come up with the age of the sedimentary layers in the earth, they will always tell you they date them by the fossils found in those sedimentary layers.

Scientific Fact No. 1 - Birds Prove Natural Selection is Naturally Wrong The body and soul of Darwin's Theory of Evolution was the idea that evolution was made possible through natural selection. As key evidence for evolution and species' gradual change over time, transitional creatures should resemble intermediate species, having skeletal and other body features in common with two.

A transitional fossil shows the evolutionary development from one species to another.

Latest Posts

For example, if "organism one" existed 70 million years ago, and "organism two" shows up in the fossil record 5 million years later, then theoretically there should be intermediate species in this 5 million year gap, which shows gradual progression from one species to another.

Scientific Facts Proving Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution is Wrong, False, and Impossible. News You Can Use. Hi, my name is Evolutionary Fraud from Piltdown, England.

Creation vs. Evolution